Re: [PATCH] [1/5] CPA: Split static_protections into required_static_prot and advised_static_prot

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...>
Cc: <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Saturday, February 9, 2008 - 10:56 am

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:

No, it's not optional. Making the PMD RO will write protect all 4k
PTEs below independent of their setting. So there is the same
restriction as we have with NX.



ROTFL.

	tglx
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] [1/5] CPA: Split static_protections into require..., Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Feb 9, 10:56 am)