de
ense
any
Hmm, I just realized that I didn't really looked at the arch interface
in details yet. Now it appears a bit inconsistent to me in its way to
tell "this arch supports that". Something in include/asm-generic that
starts with #ifdef CONFIG_X86 looks ugly, to begin with.
=2E..
Then we have this KGDB_ARCH_HAS thing here, the second way to control
arch-dependent stuff.
=2E..
=2E..
And this is the third way. Can we consolidate this?
=2E..
=2E..
f.
error.
As Linus remarked, still pointer-based return values while only the
error code is used by the callers (there are more of such cases in the
core).
=2E..
=2E..
Probably some relic from older changes which should be killed.
Jan