login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
February
»
9
Re: preempt rcu bug on s390
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...>, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...>, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: preempt rcu bug on s390
Date: Saturday, February 9, 2008 - 10:07 am
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 12:34:35PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
quoted text
> Using CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU and CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ on s390 my system always > gets stuck when running with more than one cpu. > When booting with four cpus I get all four cpus caught withing cpu_idle > and not advancing anymore. However there is the init process which is > waitung for synchronize_rcu() to complete (lcrash output): > > STACK TRACE FOR TASK: 0xf84d968 (swapper) > > STACK: > 0 schedule+842 [0x36c956] > 1 schedule_timeout+172 [0x36d0e4] > 2 wait_for_common+204 [0x36c398] > 3 synchronize_rcu+76 [0x567bc] > 4 netlink_change_ngroups+150 [0x2b4302] > 5 genl_register_mc_group+256 [0x2b6174] > 6 genl_init+188 [0x534e44] > 7 kernel_init+444 [0x518334] > 8 kernel_thread_starter+6 [0x192a6] > > If I change the code so that timer ticks won't be disabled everything > runs fine. So my guess is that rcu_needs_cpu() doesn't do the right > thing for the rcu preemptible case. > > Kernel version is git head of today. > > Any ideas?
Does this tree have
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/29/208
applied? If not, could you please check it out? Thanx, Paul --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
preempt rcu bug on s390
, Heiko Carstens
, (Sat Feb 9, 7:34 am)
Re: preempt rcu bug on s390
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Sat Feb 9, 10:07 am)
Re: preempt rcu bug on s390
, Heiko Carstens
, (Sat Feb 9, 1:14 pm)
Re: preempt rcu bug on s390
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Sat Feb 9, 6:02 pm)
Re: preempt rcu bug on s390
, Heiko Carstens
, (Sun Feb 10, 9:01 am)
Re: preempt rcu bug on s390
, Steven Rostedt
, (Mon Feb 11, 11:37 am)
Re: preempt rcu bug on s390
, Paul E. McKenney
, (Sun Feb 10, 1:43 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Max Krasnyansky
Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime us...
Jeremy Allison
Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
Randy Dunlap
Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 (pcmcia)
Damien Wyart
ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Josip Rodin
Re: bnx2_poll panicking kernel
Linus Torvalds
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Denys Fedoryshchenko
thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
4 users
and
899 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
jakecapri
bedandbreakfas
backlinkservchp
Syndicate