* Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:You are still dead wrong. You refuse to realize the _obvious_ and _fundamental_ thing that the PGE bit does: it enables global TLBs while we change MTRRs! That would be a completely new and totally untested modus operandi for a large array of x86 CPUs. You should read the Intel manual about the recommended way to change MTRRs (Vol. 3A 10-41) - it describes disabling the PGE during MTRR changes if it's enabled. The primary purpose of that is of course to flush the TLB entries - but still it's documented that way and the current code does it that way. It would be rather stupid for us to do otherwise: we simply cannot guarantee that x86 CPUs that implement MTRRs and PGE have no undocumented or _unknown_ erratas in this area. It _might_ be fine, while what you say is that it _is_ fine - which we simply cannot know. (And yes, there are documented CPU erratas related to global TLBs and MTRR's, so this area is far from being an unwritten page.) So i refuse to apply such a pointless and risky "cleanup" patch from you to arch/x86 [which increases code size as well], _especially_ given how many times i've explained this very issue to you already and especially because you continue to mislead about the true effects of the patch. Ingo --
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Yinghai Lu | Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: check for and defend against BIOS memory corruption |
| Frederik Deweerdt | [-mm patch] remove tcp header from tcp_v4_check (take #2) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching |
git: | |
