On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, David Brownell wrote:

quoted text
> > Yes, that's what I'm saying. I had a GPIO in use and rmmod-ed pca953x. It 
> > did produce an error message
> > 
> > pca953x 0-0041: gpiochip_remove() failed, -16
> > 
> > , but rmmod completed.
> 
> Doesn't that seem buglike to you?
> 
> Oh, right -- the module exit code will ignore that status, it doesn't
> even have a way to report failures any more.  Crap.
> 
> So it looks like we have no choice but to do this.  Can you make sure
> all the rmmod-capable gpio_chip drivers support this?  Ignore the SOC
> support, that never supports rmmod -- just the stuff in drivers/gpio.

As long as you find these two patches acceptable, I'll cook up an 
incremental patch to fix those.

quoted text
> > AFAIU, the only 2 ways currently to prevent rmmod  
> > from completing, are: increment module use-count, then the respective 
> > module_exit() function is not called at all and rmmod fails with -EBUSY. 
> > Or block in rmmod until the resource becomes free. None of these has 
> > happened. BTW, I think, there's the same problem with i2c adapter drivers.
> 
> Right.  In fact, every time you'd expect driver removal errors to
> cause module removal to fail.   Maybe this is part of that whole
> "should we even *support* rmmod" discussion, which I tuned out.

We don't want to start another one here, do we?:-)

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/