* Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
i think the worst is over already and i'm reasonably sure that there are
no more bugs in it - this _is_ a 1:1 patch after all, so in theory the
worst side-effect should be build breakages due to include file
spaghetti. The window for this particular breakage was just 256 commits,
that's OK i think.
If you want less stress next time around you might want to consider
pushing such patches via individual architectures, so that it can all be
shaken out (and such build bugs are found quickly) and pushed via the
architecture trees. (Even such a patch that changes the number of
cross-arch function arguments and introduces a new type can be
architectured in a way to make it per arch.)
Ingo
--