login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [RFC][PATCH] KGDB: remove kgdb-own fault handling (was: Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25)

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...>
Date: Friday, February 8, 2008 - 5:58 pm

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Jan Kiszka wrote:

That is indeed horrible code. No way will I merge anything that has things 
like that even in it's *history* (ie somebody needs to re-generate the 
tree without code like that - some things should not be allowed to exist).

That said, while just using "probe_kernel_addr()" is certainly much 
better, it's still really inefficient. If you actually want to do a "safe 
memory copy", then the right way to do that is basically to do

	pagefault_disable();
	leftover = __copy_from_user_inatomic(dst, src, count);
	pagefault_enable();

	if (leftover)
		handle_the_fact_that_the_copy_didnt_complete();

which should even be reasonably efficient and should work in all contexts 
(hardware interrupts disabled, spinlocks held, you name it).

So all those "kgdb_{get|set}_mem()" things seem bogus (they also have 
insane calling semantics - return NULL or errptr? Why not just return an 
integer error code?

		Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jan 29, 9:15 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Amit Shah, (Sat Feb 9, 10:11 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Jiri Kosina, (Sun Feb 10, 8:30 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Amit Shah, (Tue Feb 12, 3:16 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Feb 13, 4:56 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Amit Shah, (Wed Feb 13, 6:19 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Maxim Levitsky, (Mon Feb 4, 10:36 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Feb 4, 11:27 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Fri Feb 8, 1:00 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Jan Kiszka, (Fri Feb 8, 1:48 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Fri Feb 8, 2:57 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] KGDB: remove kgdb-own fault handling (was: ..., Linus Torvalds, (Fri Feb 8, 5:58 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH] KGDB: remove kgdb-own fault handling, Jason Wessel, (Fri Feb 8, 6:16 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Daniel Phillips, (Thu Feb 7, 3:20 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, John Stoffel, (Tue Feb 5, 1:45 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Feb 5, 1:52 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Bernhard Kaindl, (Fri Feb 8, 2:24 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Phil Oester, (Tue Feb 5, 12:11 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Feb 8, 12:48 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Jan Kiszka, (Fri Feb 8, 5:51 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Andrew Morton, (Tue Feb 5, 12:54 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Jan Kiszka, (Wed Feb 6, 8:08 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Daniel Phillips, (Thu Feb 7, 4:00 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jan 31, 11:57 am)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 31, 12:00 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jan 31, 12:12 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 31, 12:15 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, WANG Cong, (Thu Jan 31, 12:21 pm)
sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jan 31, 12:29 pm)
Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Jan 31, 12:50 pm)
Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 31, 1:43 pm)
Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jan 31, 2:21 pm)
Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 31, 2:38 pm)
Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Jan 31, 1:55 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Jan 31, 12:24 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 31, 12:46 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Jan 31, 12:52 pm)
Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 31, 12:04 pm)
x86 arch updates also broke s390, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Jan 30, 8:33 pm)
Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390, Martin Schwidefsky, (Thu Jan 31, 5:34 am)
Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Feb 1, 5:48 am)
Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390, Martin Schwidefsky, (Fri Feb 1, 5:54 am)
Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Feb 1, 6:02 am)
Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Feb 1, 5:52 am)
Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jan 31, 6:24 am)
Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390, Nick Piggin, (Thu Jan 31, 8:37 am)
speck-geostationary