Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » February » 8

[PATCH] [4/5] Don't use inline for the protection checks

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...>
To: <mingo@...>, <tglx@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: [PATCH] [4/5] Don't use inline for the protection checks
Date: Friday, February 8, 2008 - 9:27 am

There are multiple call sites and they are not time critical

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

---
 arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static unsigned long virt_to_highmap(voi
  * right (again, ioremap() on BIOS memory is not uncommon) so this function
  * checks and fixes these known static required protection bits.
  */
-static inline pgprot_t
+static pgprot_t
 required_static_prot(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
 	pgprot_t forbidden = __pgprot(0);
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ required_static_prot(pgprot_t prot, unsi
 	return prot;
 }
 
-static inline pgprot_t
+static pgprot_t
 advised_static_prot(pgprot_t prot, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] [1/5] CPA: Split static_protections into required_st..., Andi Kleen, (Fri Feb 8, 9:27 am)
[PATCH] [2/5] Support range checking for required/advisory p..., Andi Kleen, (Fri Feb 8, 9:27 am)
[PATCH] [5/5] Switch i386 early boot page table initilizatio..., Andi Kleen, (Fri Feb 8, 9:27 am)
[PATCH] [4/5] Don't use inline for the protection checks, Andi Kleen, (Fri Feb 8, 9:27 am)
[PATCH] [3/5] CPA: Make advised protection check truly advis..., Andi Kleen, (Fri Feb 8, 9:27 am)