Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Thursday, February 7, 2008 - 6:28 pm

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, David Miller wrote:

I seriously doubt the same is true for the IO requests (which are 
different anyway, and tend to happen at a much lower frequency than 
high-speed networking).

I also suspect that your timings were very hardware-dependent in the first 
place (and yes, the long-term effect is likely working against that 
"optimization"), and depend a lot on just how sparse the initialization 
can to be.

		Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/8] IO queuing and complete affinity, Jens Axboe, (Thu Feb 7, 2:18 am)
[patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Feb 7, 3:49 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/8] IO queuing and complete affinity, Alan D. Brunelle, (Thu Feb 7, 8:16 am)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Feb 7, 10:42 am)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Jens Axboe, (Thu Feb 7, 10:55 am)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Feb 7, 12:31 pm)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Jens Axboe, (Thu Feb 7, 1:06 pm)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, David Miller, (Thu Feb 7, 6:22 pm)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Feb 7, 6:28 pm)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Jens Axboe, (Fri Feb 8, 4:38 am)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Feb 8, 8:09 am)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Nick Piggin, (Fri Feb 8, 3:44 pm)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Feb 8, 3:56 pm)
Re: [patch] block layer: kmemcheck fixes, Nick Piggin, (Fri Feb 8, 4:58 pm)