On 02/07/2008 03:30 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
quoted text
>> Did you test without CONFIG_PARAVIRT, and CONFIG_PARAVIRT booted both with and
>> without the "noreplace-paravirt" parameter?
> 
> I did not test CONFIG_PARAVIRT at all.  I just fixed what its introduction
> had done to break generic x86-64.
> 
> 

It looks you may have broken paravirt (if even that case worked) because
the iret is actually at the iret_label you removed (after the instruction
is patched.) And most likely neither version worked with "noreplace-paravirt',
because then the iret instruction is out-of-line and the INTERRUPT_RETURN
jumps to it.


--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/