Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines | KernelTrap

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>

To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>

Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...>, Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...>

Subject: Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines

Date: Thursday, February 7, 2008 - 6:53 pm

On Thursday, 7 of February 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
quoted text> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > -	rep; stosl
> > +	rep
> > +	stosl
> 
> Yuck!
> 
> Please don't perpetuate the braindamage that this is two instructions. 
> It's one instruction with a modifier;

Sure, it is.

quoted text> the fact that gas wants a separator is broken enough as it is.

[Well, the newline is a separator too.]  I'll keep it in one line if you want
that.

Rafael
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Tue Feb 5, 3:06 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Feb 6, 7:37 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Feb 5, 9:27 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Feb 6, 7:48 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 6:12 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Feb 7, 6:38 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:58 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Feb 8, 6:01 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 6:08 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Feb 8, 8:18 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Feb 8, 8:32 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Sun Feb 10, 5:14 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Feb 10, 5:21 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Feb 9, 9:48 am)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:56 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 7:06 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Thu Feb 7, 7:35 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Feb 7, 7:42 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 3:04 am)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Feb 8, 12:23 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:00 pm)

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix..., Alan Stern, (Fri Feb 8, 5:20 pm)

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix..., Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:23 pm)

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix..., H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Feb 8, 5:27 pm)

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix..., Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:31 pm)

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Feb 8, 5:56 pm)

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix..., Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:59 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Feb 8, 5:02 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:09 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Feb 8, 5:18 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Feb 8, 3:40 am)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 7:36 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Thu Feb 7, 7:41 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Feb 7, 7:13 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Thu Feb 7, 6:28 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Feb 7, 6:46 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 6:57 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Feb 7, 7:14 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:35 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Thu Feb 7, 6:51 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 7:09 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 6:40 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:13 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Maxim Levitsky, (Fri Feb 8, 5:41 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:51 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Feb 7, 6:45 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Thu Feb 7, 6:49 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Feb 7, 6:44 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 6:53 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Feb 7, 6:28 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:49 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:41 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Sam Ravnborg, (Fri Feb 8, 5:47 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:34 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Fri Feb 8, 5:31 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Feb 7, 6:34 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Feb 5, 9:36 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Feb 5, 9:42 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Feb 5, 9:51 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Bill Davidsen, (Wed Feb 13, 10:54 pm)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Wed Feb 6, 7:29 am)

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Feb 5, 9:56 pm)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Amit K. Arora	[RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()

Tarkan Erimer	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
git:

openbsd-misc:

linux-netdev:
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
Matheos Worku	2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X

Colocation donated by:

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 941 guests online.

Syndicate