login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...>, Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Date: Thursday, February 7, 2008 - 6:28 pm

> ===================================================================

Can we please use C style in this file.
Like this:

{
	.header : {
		*(.header)
	}

It is not as short as the above but it pays of to keep
an consistent style in the whole file and across
different .lds files.

And for good measure name it wakeup.lds.

Do we never need data from a .h file?
If we do name it wakeup.lds.S and kbuild
will fix it (assuming we have wakeup.lds
as a prerequisite where it is needed.

Why?
Why?
Why?
Why?
PAGE_SIZE * 4?


	Sam
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Pavel Machek, (Tue Feb 5, 3:06 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Feb 6, 7:37 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Feb 5, 9:27 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Feb 6, 7:48 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 6:12 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Feb 8, 6:01 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Feb 8, 8:18 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Feb 9, 9:48 am)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 7:06 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Feb 8, 12:23 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 7:36 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 6:57 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 7:09 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 6:40 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Feb 7, 6:53 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu Feb 7, 6:28 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Feb 5, 9:42 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Bill Davidsen, (Wed Feb 13, 10:54 pm)
Re: [rft] s2ram wakeup moves to .c, could fix few machines, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Feb 5, 9:56 pm)
speck-geostationary