Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Bob Copeland <me@...>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <ath5k-devel@...>, <linux-wireless@...>, Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@...>
Date: Thursday, February 7, 2008 - 5:51 pm

On 02/07/2008 10:25 PM, Tino Keitel wrote:

Seems hold for this case too, as Bob noted.


What's the srev a phy ver printed few lines above this, please?
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
ath5k failure with 2.6.24-git14, Tino Keitel, (Tue Feb 5, 6:57 pm)
Re: ath5k failure with 2.6.24-git14, Andrew Morton, (Wed Feb 6, 5:41 am)
Re: ath5k failure with 2.6.24-git14, Bob Copeland, (Wed Feb 6, 11:37 am)
[RFT 1/1] single_chip test, Jiri Slaby, (Wed Feb 6, 6:42 am)
Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test, Joseph Fannin, (Wed Feb 6, 11:00 am)
Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test, Bob Copeland, (Wed Feb 6, 11:46 am)
Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test, Tino Keitel, (Thu Feb 7, 5:25 pm)
Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test, Jiri Slaby, (Thu Feb 7, 5:51 pm)
Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test, Tino Keitel, (Fri Feb 8, 3:28 am)
Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test, Andreas Schwab, (Wed Feb 6, 6:48 am)
Re: [RFT 1/1] single_chip test, Jiri Slaby, (Wed Feb 6, 6:53 am)