On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 13:54:06 -0700 "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:Well I think we'd like to see the patches appear in Paul's tree well before the merge window if poss - that way they'll get a little bit of tyre-kicking and perhaps review via -mm. Kamalesh and I (at least) do perform build- and runtime testing of powerpc. I would request that Paul copy myself and the main mailing list on pull requests. It seems wrong that the signoff trail for that patch didn't actually reflect reality - it should have had both Josh's and Paul's signoffs. That would require that the changelog be altered during git->git transfers which I expect is just incompatible with the way git works (as far as I dimly understand it). It never hurts to send a patch to lkml even if you believe it isn't of general interest. People will pass an idle eye across it, and things might get picked up, yielding improvements. Plus more people know about its existence. Probably this is more the case for something which resides under drivers/char/ than with something which resides in arch/powerpc/... --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 008/196] Chinese: add translation of volatile-considered-harmful.txt |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | Re: [Patch v2] Make PCI extended config space (MMCONFIG) a driver opt-in |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Rémi Denis-Courmont | [PATCH 01/14] Phonet global definitions |
