On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:

quoted text
> As discussed on i2c mailing list with David Brownell, and number
> outside of the 0...MAX_INT range is invalid as a GPIO number.
> Define a macro, similar to NO_IRQ, to be used as a deliberate
> invalid GPIO, rather than defining a is_valid_gpio() macro.

David, I think, your ack is required on this one. Can we get it in, 
please? My soc-camera patches are accepted by the v4l maintainer, and 
without this one the series would be incomplete.

Thanks
Guennadi

quoted text
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@pengutronix.de>
> 
> ---
> 
> As gpiolib doesn't seem to have an own mailing list, sending it directly 
> to LKML.
> 
>  include/asm-generic/gpio.h |    4 ++++
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
> index f29a502..806b86c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@
>  #define ARCH_NR_GPIOS		256
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef NO_GPIO
> +#define NO_GPIO			((unsigned int)-1)
> +#endif
> +
>  struct seq_file;
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 1.5.3.4
> 

---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/