Re: remount-ro & umount & quota interaction

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jan Kara <jack@...>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@...>, Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, February 7, 2008 - 10:10 am

On Feb 7 2008 15:04, Jan Kara wrote:

Objection. XFS handles quotas differently that does not involve
modifying a file on the fs, so quotas could stay on (even if it does
not make much sense) while the fs is ro.

(Hm, storing quota as files reminds me of the ugly xattr hack in
reiserfs3.)
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
remount-ro &amp; umount &amp; quota interaction, Michael Tokarev, (Wed Feb 6, 1:55 pm)
Re: remount-ro &amp; umount &amp; quota interaction, Michael Tokarev, (Thu Feb 7, 6:49 am)
Re: remount-ro &amp; umount &amp; quota interaction, Michael Tokarev, (Thu Feb 7, 11:36 am)
Re: remount-ro & umount & quota interaction, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu Feb 7, 10:10 am)
Re: remount-ro &amp; umount &amp; quota interaction, David Chinner, (Thu Feb 7, 8:32 pm)