Re: [stable] The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Greg KH <greg@...>
Cc: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Stable Team <stable@...>
Date: Thursday, February 7, 2008 - 8:16 am

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote:


http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=9d55b9923a...
 
I did a simpler version by just replacing LOCK_PREFIX with lock. The
reason is, that we would need a separate implementation for
__futex_atomic_op1() as well, due to:

case FUTEX_OP_ADD:
	__futex_atomic_op1(LOCK_PREFIX "xaddl %0, %2", ret, oldval,

And it's not really worth the trouble.

Backport to 2.6.24 and 2.6.23 attached.

Thanks,
	tglx
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?, Chuck Ebbert, (Mon Jan 21, 4:47 pm)
Re: The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Jan 22, 8:35 am)
Re: The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?, Chuck Ebbert, (Tue Jan 22, 4:19 pm)
Re: [stable] The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Feb 7, 8:16 am)
Re: The SMP alternatives code breaks exception fixup?, Chuck Ebbert, (Mon Jan 21, 5:25 pm)