Hi,

On Thursday 07 February 2008 09:08, Pierre Ossman wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:25:42 +0100
> Frank Seidel <fseidel@suse.de> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Frank Seidel <fseidel@suse.de>
> 
> I see you've guys have kept yourself busy in my absence. :)

Yes, we really did :)

quoted text
> As for the patch, it looks ok although I'm not really a fan of more
> voodoo constants that noone knows what they mean. Could you add some
> comments explaining some of them at least?  

I also don't like that voodoo, but as long as we don't have more information
or let alone specs.. well, i really wish i could provide more than
the already IMHO obvious sequence.. voodoo-adress and value to make config
bit writeable, set voodo-bit and cleanup again.

quoted text
> > +	if (fw_dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476) {
> 
> *snip*
> 
> > +	} else {
> > +		/* via R5C832 */
> 
> Wouldn't it be prudent to have a check that this is indeed a R5C832,
> and a failure mode if it's none of the two known devices? 

Also thought about that, but as far as i can see this cannot happen since
we only probe for those two devices and deny to continue if anything else
/those two were not found in the beginning.

Thanks,
Frank
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/