Re: [PATCH] reduce large do_mount stack usage with noinlines

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, February 6, 2008 - 7:22 pm

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:11:38 -0600
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:


What we could do here is defined a new noinline_because_of_stack_suckiness
and use that.  Reasons:

- self-documenting, so we don't need to comment each site

- can be made a no-op for suitable __GNUC__ values if gcc ever fixes this

- our children we can go through and delete them all when nobody is using
  the offending gcc versions any more.

what thinkest thou?
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] reduce large do_mount stack usage with noinlines, Andrew Morton, (Wed Feb 6, 7:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH] reduce large do_mount stack usage with noinlines, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Feb 7, 7:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH] reduce large do_mount stack usage with noinlines, Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Feb 6, 6:54 pm)