H. Peter Anvin schrieb:Here is an older bisection try: $ git bisect log git-bisect start # bad: [dd430ca20c40ecccd6954a7efd13d4398f507728] Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86 git-bisect bad dd430ca20c40ecccd6954a7efd13d4398f507728 # good: [49914084e797530d9baaf51df9eda77babc98fa8] Linux 2.6.24 git-bisect good 49914084e797530d9baaf51df9eda77babc98fa8 # good: [f4d900a2cae94256f56be7769734100c7054bf00] [NETLINK]: Mark attribute construction exception unlikely git-bisect good f4d900a2cae94256f56be7769734100c7054bf00 # good: [85040bcb4643cba578839e953f25e2d1965d83d0] [IPV6] ADDRLABEL: Fix double free on label deletion. git-bisect good 85040bcb4643cba578839e953f25e2d1965d83d0 # good: [70fd93c9d9e07dd2ea4465df76a0ddd414fd21ac] x86: export cpu_gdt_descr git-bisect good 70fd93c9d9e07dd2ea4465df76a0ddd414fd21ac # bad: [306c142f99caef5a30a0d61a39a956c069941b63] x86: pat: e820 cleanup git-bisect bad 306c142f99caef5a30a0d61a39a956c069941b63 # bad: [7271339347653f6d652bb47aaee1f57d936002f6] x86: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/k7.c checkpatch fixes git-bisect bad 7271339347653f6d652bb47aaee1f57d936002f6 # bad: [7818a1e0294debee02d5135e17b89f28b8871887] x86: provide 64-bit with a load_sp0 function. git-bisect bad 7818a1e0294debee02d5135e17b89f28b8871887 # bad: [2215e69d2cf5024647f9a034807990590d25dd4e] x86 boot: use E820 memory map on EFI 32 platform git-bisect bad 2215e69d2cf5024647f9a034807990590d25dd4e # good: [26048d75e8d6c840742468667f4a7ab8c2df74c9] x86: use the same data type for tls_array. git-bisect good 26048d75e8d6c840742468667f4a7ab8c2df74c9 # good: [341d8854d38fe6e7655f7748babae5c25a51aa70] x86: remove fastcall from include/asm-x86 git-bisect good 341d8854d38fe6e7655f7748babae5c25a51aa70 # good: [8c8b8859b64baf6d7c33900e8720c7bafe775b2c] mcheck mce_64: mce_read_sem to mutex git-bisect good 8c8b8859b64baf6d7c33900e8720c7bafe775b2c # good: [de18c850af701ac9512b7239e88fa45e4c168771] x86: EFI runtime service support: EFI runtime services git-bisect good de18c850af701ac9512b7239e88fa45e4c168771 # bad: [e429795c68d3001ecae74f6465420c9f043b0ece] x86: EFI runtime service support: remove duplicated code from efi_32.c git-bisect bad e429795c68d3001ecae74f6465420c9f043b0ece # good: [9ad65e4748f55e3159283d7fa9d54fb30c086113] x86: EFI runtime service support: document for EFI runtime services git-bisect good 9ad65e4748f55e3159283d7fa9d54fb30c086113 I can not revert the commit e429795c68d3001ecae74f6465420c9f043b0ece. it gave me errors. but i'm also not sure what could be wrong with this commit! my first idea was that the commit "[2215e69d2cf5024647f9a034807990590d25dd4e] x86 boot: use E820 memory map on EFI 32 platform" is the offender, because the macbook pro doesn't provide a e820 memory map at all. but bisect showed that i'm wrong here?! confused greeting thomas --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: 2.6.25-rc2 System no longer powers off after suspend-to-disk. Screen becomes g... |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Ray Lee | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
