Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:11:03 -0800 Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 07:27:53PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> kgdb? Not so interesting. We have many more hard problems happening at 
>>> user sites, not in developer hands.
>> FWIW, I'm not a fulltime developer by any means, but on occasion
>> I have fixed a few bugs in the netfilter area of the kernel.
>> And in almost all cases, I used kgdb in my debugging and testing
> 
>                                                            ^^^^^^^
>> of fixes.  
> 
> yup.

I can also underline this - and add the aspect that a kernel debugger
may also nicely serve to explore tricky code paths interactively. This
specifically can lower the entrance barrier to complex kernel subsystems
for new developers/bug hunters.

With the latest changes, now all available through Jason's git repos for
2.6.25, kgdb should be usable again ("Now even more stable than ever!"
;) ). It became much less invasive towards critical code paths during
recent rounds of refactoring, so we can hopefully meet the requirements
for merging it upstream soon (2.6.26?).

While too many people consider a debugger as _the_ tool for kernel
development, which it clearly isn't, it remains a fairly useful feature,
and I don't see any regression, technically or organizationally, it may
introduce to Linux. IMHO, it would be a pity if kgdb have to remain out
off tree and may potentially fall back at quality levels that many of us
had fought with in the past.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/