Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@...>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-acpi@...>
Date: Wednesday, February 6, 2008 - 6:09 am

On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 09:30 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
[...]

I do not know if this is relevant... but for example, with a i915 hw
here (toshiba laptop):

#cat max_brightness 
100

#echo 50 > brightness ; cat actual_brightness 
0
#echo 60 > brightness ; cat actual_brightness 
0
#echo 70 > brightness ; cat actual_brightness 
70
#echo 80 > brightness ; cat actual_brightness 
0
#echo 90 > brightness ; cat actual_brightness 
0
#echo 100 > brightness ; cat actual_brightness 
100

#uname -a
Linux rukbat 2.6.24 #13 SMP PREEMPT Fri Feb 1 13:12:23 CET 2008 i686 GNU/Linux

which is at least strange (and probably broken). actual_brightness is
real, when it says 0 backlight is off. You can imagine what happens
using the backlight up/down control... flashing lights! 

Romano


-- 
Sorry for the disclaimer --- ¡I cannot stop it!



--
La presente comunicación tiene carácter confidencial y es para el exclusivo uso del destinatario indicado en la misma. Si Ud. no es el destinatario indicado, le informamos que cualquier forma de distribución, reproducción o uso de esta comunicación y/o de la información contenida en la misma están estrictamente prohibidos por la ley. Si Ud. ha recibido esta comunicación por error, por favor, notifíquelo inmediatamente al remitente contestando a este mensaje y proceda a continuación a destruirlo. Gracias por su colaboración.

This communication contains confidential information. It is for the exclusive use of the intended addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, please note that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited by law. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy this message. Thank you for your cooperation. 
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Matthew Garrett, (Tue Dec 25, 10:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Andrew Morton, (Sun Jan 27, 2:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Matthew Garrett, (Sun Jan 27, 9:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Andrew Morton, (Mon Jan 28, 1:10 am)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Sat Feb 2, 7:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Romano Giannetti, (Wed Feb 6, 6:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Mon Jan 28, 11:51 am)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Matthew Garrett, (Mon Jan 28, 1:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Matthew Garrett, (Sat Jan 26, 10:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Matthew Garrett, (Tue Jan 22, 7:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Tue Jan 22, 8:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] Rationalise ACPI backlight implementation, Matthew Garrett, (Sun Jan 13, 9:51 pm)