Re: [PATCH 3/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time to return struct timespec

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Marcin Slusarz
Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2008 - 12:12 pm

On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:48:31PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
No, the ordering is ok. Creation of udf_fill_inode_time was an intermediate
state in this cleanup. Every step is obvious and easy. When I tried to create
just one patch it didn't look so obvious, so I decided to send it in 4 parts.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/6] udf: next round of cleanups, marcin.slusarz, (Sun Feb 3, 11:36 am)
[PATCH 5/6] udf: remove unneeded kernel_timestamp type, marcin.slusarz, (Sun Feb 3, 11:36 am)
[PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization, Marcin Slusarz, (Sun Feb 3, 11:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization, Jan Kara, (Tue Feb 5, 9:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 3/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time to return s ..., Marcin Slusarz, (Tue Feb 5, 12:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization, Marcin Slusarz, (Tue Feb 5, 12:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization, Jan Kara, (Wed Feb 6, 4:09 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/6] udf: remove unneeded kernel_timestamp type, Marcin Slusarz, (Sun Feb 10, 3:29 am)
Re: [PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization, Marcin Slusarz, (Sun Feb 10, 3:33 am)