Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <oliver.pntr@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...>, James Morris <jmorris@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2008 - 1:39 am

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)"  <oliver.pntr@gmail.com> wrote:


It looks like selinux's file_has_perm() is doing spin_lock() on an
uninitialised (or already locked) spinlock.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS, Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)..., (Mon Jan 28, 4:31 am)
Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS, Andrew Morton, (Tue Feb 5, 1:39 am)
Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS, Stephen Smalley, (Tue Feb 5, 9:46 am)
Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS, James Morris, (Tue Feb 5, 6:02 am)
[2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS, Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)..., (Mon Jan 28, 12:25 pm)
Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS, Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)..., (Mon Jan 28, 12:27 pm)