Re: issue with patch "x86: no CPA on iounmap"

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...>
Cc: <tglx@...>, <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2008 - 12:41 am

Siddha, Suresh B wrote:

this is a hard one; because the flipside is someone ioremapping the same page twice
(which is not impossible if there's 2 1k bars)... and then one of them gets iounmapped,
which would turn the page cachable again.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
issue with patch "x86: no CPA on iounmap", Siddha, Suresh B, (Mon Feb 4, 9:13 pm)
Re: issue with patch "x86: no CPA on iounmap", Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Feb 5, 12:48 am)
Re: issue with patch "x86: no CPA on iounmap", Ingo Molnar, (Tue Feb 5, 3:05 am)
Re: issue with patch "x86: no CPA on iounmap", Siddha, Suresh B, (Thu Feb 7, 4:02 pm)
Re: issue with patch "x86: no CPA on iounmap", Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Feb 5, 3:14 am)
Re: issue with patch "x86: no CPA on iounmap", Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Feb 5, 12:41 am)