On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:Why would you want authorization? If you don't use IP (just ethernet framing), then 99% of the time the solution is to just trust the subnet. So most people would never want TLS/SSL, and the ones that *do* want it would probably also want IP routing, so you'd actually be better off with a separate higher-level bridging protocol rather than have TLS/SSL as part of the actual packet protocol. So don't add complexity. The beauty of ATA-over-ethernet is exactly that it's simple and straightforward. (Simple and straightforward is also nice for actually creating devices that are the targets of this. I just *bet* that an iSCSI target device probably needs two orders of magnitude more CPU power than a simple AoE thing that can probably be done in an FPGA with no real software at all). Whatever. We have now officially gotten totally off topic ;) Linus --
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] net: Fix the prototype of call_netdevice_notifiers |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
