On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
err, what? I though I was going to merge these:
slub-move-count_partial.patch
slub-rename-numa-defrag_ratio-to-remote_node_defrag_ratio.patch
slub-consolidate-add_partial-and-add_partial_tail-to-one-function.patch
slub-use-non-atomic-bit-unlock.patch
slub-fix-coding-style-violations.patch
slub-noinline-some-functions-to-avoid-them-being-folded-into-alloc-free.patch
slub-move-kmem_cache_node-determination-into-add_full-and-add_partial.patch
slub-avoid-checking-for-a-valid-object-before-zeroing-on-the-fast-path.patch
slub-__slab_alloc-exit-path-consolidation.patch
slub-provide-unique-end-marker-for-each-slab.patch
slub-avoid-referencing-kmem_cache-structure-in-__slab_alloc.patch
slub-optional-fast-path-using-cmpxchg_local.patch
slub-do-our-own-locking-via-slab_lock-and-slab_unlock.patch
slub-restructure-slab-alloc.patch
slub-comment-kmem_cache_cpu-structure.patch
slub-fix-sysfs-refcounting.patch
before you went and changed things under my feet.
Please clarify.
--