On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:36:19 -0500
"Lee Revell" <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
quoted text > On Jan 30, 2008 1:54 PM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > IANAL, and I would therefore ask a lawyer whether, and if yes under
> > which circumstances, shipping a binary driver written for another OS
> > dynamically linked into the Linux kernel would not be a criminal offense.
> >
>
> Please stop throwing around words like "criminal". If this is in fact
> illegal it would be a civil matter.
Actually in large parts of europe multiple repeated infractions of
copyright law are criminal matters.
Alan
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux , Alan Cox , (Mon Feb 4, 8:42 am)