Why "of course" ?
In the cited example it's illegal to go outside certain parameters
SOMEWHERE (if it was illegal everywhere, the the hardware shouldn't
allow it and the sw could do nothing... not considering hw mods).
Another example is WiFi: USA, Europe and Japan allows a different number
of channels. But every AP I have had simply asks which country the user
is in, then allows only a limited choice for the channel to use.
If I'm in Europe but tell my AP that I'm in Japan, it lets me choose
channel 13 (Europe allows up to ch 11). If the "cops" find it out, they
prosecute ME, not my AP! It's not a TECHNICAL limit, it's a LEGAL one.
So there's no point in keeping a driver closed *just* because else
someone could hack it to make it work outside the allowed parameters:
even a closed driver is hackable (just reverse engineer it...).
Think about this scenario: a closed source driver contains:
if(power<100)
setpower(power);
else
setpower(100);
to limit tx power and make it legal. Then the user finds this 100 and
replaces it with 255 (inside the binary-only module), actually allowing
for more than twice (if power is in mW) the legally permitted power.
Is it legal?
I don't think so (and I doubt you can find any lawyer that does). But
it's not THE DRIVER that's doing something illegal. It's THE USER.
It would be equally illegal if the driver was open source. Simpler to
do, but equally illegal.
Another example: how do you detect, from a driver, if the user actually
got a license/permission from the government (somewhere it's needed, or
you need to pay an annual fee) to use the device? You can't. Does this
missing check make the device illegal? Nope. Just its USE.
I stop here cause it's already too OT.
BYtE,
Diego.
--
