login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
February
»
3
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>
Cc: Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <arjan@...>, <mingo@...>, <ak@...>, <jens.axboe@...>, <James.Bottomley@...>, <andrea@...>, <clameter@...>, <akpm@...>, <andrew.vasquez@...>, <willy@...>, Zach Brown <zach.brown@...>
Subject:
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues
Date: Sunday, February 3, 2008 - 7:58 am
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:53:02PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
quoted text
> Hi Nick, > > On Feb 3, 2008 11:52 AM, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote: > > +asmlinkage void smp_call_function_fast_interrupt(void) > > +{ > > [snip] > > > + while (!list_empty(&list)) { > > + struct call_single_data *data; > > + > > + data = list_entry(list.next, struct call_single_data, list); > > + list_del(&data->list); > > + > > + data->func(data->info); > > + if (data->wait) { > > + smp_mb(); > > + data->wait = 0; > > Why do we need smp_mb() here (maybe add a comment to keep > Andrew/checkpatch happy)?
Yeah, definitely... it's just a really basic RFC, but I should get into the habit of just doing it anyway. Thanks, Nick --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Fri Jul 27, 9:21 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Sun Feb 3, 5:52 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Mon Feb 4, 5:47 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Andi Kleen
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:30 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Jens Axboe
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:12 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:31 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Jens Axboe
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:33 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, James Bottomley
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:28 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, David Chinner
, (Sun Feb 3, 10:10 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Zach Brown
, (Mon Feb 4, 2:21 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Jens Axboe
, (Mon Feb 4, 4:10 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Mon Feb 4, 5:45 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Feb 5, 4:24 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Mon Feb 4, 12:14 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, David Chinner
, (Mon Feb 4, 12:40 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:09 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, David Chinner
, (Mon Feb 4, 8:14 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Fri Feb 8, 3:50 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Pekka Enberg
, (Sun Feb 3, 6:53 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Sun Feb 3, 7:58 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Jul 30, 2:20 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Mon Jul 30, 4:35 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Jul 31, 12:19 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Tue Jul 31, 1:14 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Jul 31, 8:41 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Tue Jul 31, 8:55 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Jul 31, 9:24 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Ingo Molnar
[patch 02/13] syslets: add syslet.h include file, user API/ABI definitions
Heiko Carstens
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 010/196] Chinese: add translation of Codingstyle
Rafael J. Wysocki
[Bug #10629] 2.6.26-rc1-$sha1: RIP __d_lookup+0x8c/0x160
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments
Linus Torvalds
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Mark Lord
Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
737 guests
online.
Online users
strcmp
Syndicate