login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
February
»
3
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>
Cc: Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <arjan@...>, <mingo@...>, <ak@...>, <jens.axboe@...>, <James.Bottomley@...>, <andrea@...>, <clameter@...>, <akpm@...>, <andrew.vasquez@...>, <willy@...>, Zach Brown <zach.brown@...>
Subject:
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues
Date: Sunday, February 3, 2008 - 6:53 am
Hi Nick, On Feb 3, 2008 11:52 AM, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
quoted text
> +asmlinkage void smp_call_function_fast_interrupt(void) > +{
[snip]
quoted text
> + while (!list_empty(&list)) { > + struct call_single_data *data; > + > + data = list_entry(list.next, struct call_single_data, list); > + list_del(&data->list); > + > + data->func(data->info); > + if (data->wait) { > + smp_mb(); > + data->wait = 0;
Why do we need smp_mb() here (maybe add a comment to keep Andrew/checkpatch happy)? Pekka --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Fri Jul 27, 9:21 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Sun Feb 3, 5:52 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Mon Feb 4, 5:47 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Andi Kleen
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:30 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Jens Axboe
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:12 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:31 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Jens Axboe
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:33 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, James Bottomley
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:28 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, David Chinner
, (Sun Feb 3, 10:10 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Zach Brown
, (Mon Feb 4, 2:21 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Jens Axboe
, (Mon Feb 4, 4:10 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Mon Feb 4, 5:45 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Feb 5, 4:24 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Mon Feb 4, 12:14 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, David Chinner
, (Mon Feb 4, 12:40 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Mon Feb 4, 6:09 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, David Chinner
, (Mon Feb 4, 8:14 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Fri Feb 8, 3:50 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Pekka Enberg
, (Sun Feb 3, 6:53 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Sun Feb 3, 7:58 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Christoph Lameter
, (Mon Jul 30, 2:20 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Mon Jul 30, 4:35 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Jul 31, 12:19 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Tue Jul 31, 1:14 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Jul 31, 8:41 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Siddha, Suresh B
, (Tue Jul 31, 8:55 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is...
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Jul 31, 9:24 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Natalie Protasevich
[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Bart Van Assche
Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Andi Kleen
[PATCH x86] [0/16] Various i386/x86-64 changes
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Linus Torvalds
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Jeff Kirsher
[net-next PATCH 1/7] e1000e: enable CRC stripping by default
netbsd-tech-kern
:
Jukka Andberg
ata/wdc vs gcc3 on amiga
YAMAMOTO Takashi
Re: wd.c patch to reduce kernel stack usage
Jason Thorpe
Re: ksyms patches.
rick
NFS transport
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
871 guests
online.
Syndicate