Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>
Cc: Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <arjan@...>, <mingo@...>, <ak@...>, <jens.axboe@...>, <James.Bottomley@...>, <andrea@...>, <clameter@...>, <akpm@...>, <andrew.vasquez@...>, <willy@...>, Zach Brown <zach.brown@...>
Date: Sunday, February 3, 2008 - 6:53 am

Hi Nick,

On Feb 3, 2008 11:52 AM, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:

[snip]


Why do we need smp_mb() here (maybe add a comment to keep
Andrew/checkpatch happy)?

                        Pekka
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability issues, Siddha, Suresh B, (Fri Jul 27, 9:21 pm)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is..., Pekka Enberg, (Sun Feb 3, 6:53 am)
Re: [rfc] direct IO submission and completion scalability is..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Jul 30, 2:20 pm)