Re: bad paravirt/Xen interaction in "x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA support - alternatives"

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...>
Date: Friday, February 29, 2008 - 5:09 pm

H. Peter Anvin wrote:

(lguest too, of course)


No, it would be irritating to implement.

Seems to me that doing the update in a temporary kmap_atomic mapping 
would be a more straightforward way to go, anyway.  How would you 
implement this on a processor without something like X86_CR0_WP?

    J
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
bad paravirt/Xen interaction in "x86 - Enhance DEBUG_RODATA ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Feb 29, 4:39 pm)
Re: bad paravirt/Xen interaction in "x86 - Enhance DEBUG_ROD..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Feb 29, 5:09 pm)
Re: bad paravirt/Xen interaction in "x86 - Enhance DEBUG_ROD..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Mar 3, 1:58 pm)
Re: bad paravirt/Xen interaction in "x86 - Enhance , Andi Kleen, (Mon Mar 3, 2:03 pm)
Re: bad paravirt/Xen interaction in "x86 - Enhance DEBUG_ROD..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Mar 3, 2:05 pm)
Re: bad paravirt/Xen interaction in "x86 - Enhance DEBUG_ROD..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Mar 3, 6:15 pm)
Re: bad paravirt/Xen interaction in "x86 - Enhance DEBUG_ROD..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Mar 4, 12:12 am)