On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:53 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text
> 
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > 
> > I already know what USB folks will say.  They want proprietary drivers
> > to be in the userspace.  I doubt ndiswrapper will ever be ported to the
> > userspace.  It's much more likely that some other approach will be used.
> 
> If that's the case, then talk to the USB people. Maybe they are ok with 
> wrapping them in GPL wrappers. But it sounds like they would prefer the 
> stricter GPLONLY meaning (ie no ndiswrapper), and it's their code.

This still leaves us with the workqueue interface:

__create_workqueue_key
destroy_workqueue
flush_workqueue
queue_work

ndiswrapper has its own workqueue implementation, but it would be great
to avoid code duplication.

As for task_nice(), it's strange that task_nice() is GPLONLY, but
set_user_nice() is not.  Anyway, it can probably be worked around.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/