* Christoph Lameter (clameter@sgi.com) wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> 
> > * Christoph Lameter (clameter@sgi.com) wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > 
> > > > In short, the we also use the versioning to check for change of slab.
> 
> Then we do not need the page->end field anymore right? I will try 
> to rediff your patch against current slab-mm and see how we can proceed 
> from there.

I guess you could replace page->end with the (expensive)
page_address(page) + 1 in new_slab.

You would also have to change slab_address() to use
page_address(page). Since this is used by check_valid_pointer, I am not
sure it's a good idea to use this slow operation there.

Or maybe you have a different alternative in mind ?

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/