A change after 2.6.24 broke ndiswrapper by accidentally removing its
access to GPL-only symbols.  Revert that change and add comments about
the reasons why ndiswrapper and driverloader are treated in a special
way.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
---

 kernel/module.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 901cd6a..a11f523 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -1933,8 +1933,15 @@ static struct module *load_module(void __user *umod,
 	/* Set up license info based on the info section */
 	set_license(mod, get_modinfo(sechdrs, infoindex, "license"));
 
+	/*
+	 * ndiswrapper is under GPL by itself, but loads proprietary modules.
+	 * Don't use add_taint_module(), as it would prevent ndiswrapper from
+	 * using GPL-only symbols it needs.
+	 */
 	if (strcmp(mod->name, "ndiswrapper") == 0)
-		add_taint_module(mod, TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE);
+		add_taint(TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE);
+
+	/* driverloader was caught wrongly pretending to be under GPL */
 	if (strcmp(mod->name, "driverloader") == 0)
 		add_taint_module(mod, TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE);
 

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/