On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:19:26PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:exactly. That's why I think that requiring the server to explicitly allow socket reuse is mandatory. On another side of the problem, I really think that we should make the simultaneous connect configurable. I've been patching all of my own 2.4 kernels for a while to add a config option to turn it off because there is a real security issue with this on. At least for mainline, it should be a sysctl. No stateful firewall I know supports the feature, so legitimate uses of this feature are likely very very small. Willy --
| Arnd Bergmann | SCHED_IDLE documentation |
| david | Re: limits on raid |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: multiple updates |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: Rescheduling interrupts |
git: | |
| Russ Brown | git-svn: Branching clarifications |
| Sam Song | Fwd: [OT] Re: Git via a proxy server? |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: More precise tag following |
| Pierre Habouzit | Re: People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Michael | Virtual interface |
| Stijn | Re: libiconv problem |
| Stefan Beke | mail dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files |
| Amaury De Ganseman | "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" when using bittorrent or another p2p |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Darren Senn | Re: Elm |
| Seung-Chul Woo | Is it possible to mount GNU HURD file system as DOS in SLS? |
| David Willmore | Re: Intel, the Pentium and Linux |
