Linda Walsh wrote:
quoted text > You didn't say anything about #processors or speed, nor
> did you say anything about your hard disk's raw-io ability.
> You also didn't mention what kernel version or whether or not
> you were using the new UID-group cpu scheduler in 2.6.24 (which likes
> to default to 'on'; not a great choice for single-user, desktop-type
> machines, if I understand its grouping policy).
> Are you sure neither end of the copy is cpu-bound on ssh/scp
> encrypt/decrypt calculations? It might not just be inability
> to read from disk, but low cpu availability. Scp can be alot
> more CPU intensive than you would expect... Just something to
> consider...
>
Good point, and may I note that you *can* choose your encryption, I use
'blowfish' for normal operation, since I have some faitly slow machines
with a Gbit net between them.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Disk schedulers , Bill Davidsen , (Thu Feb 28, 1:14 pm)