login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [RFC] Disk shock protection (revisited)

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alan Cox <alan@...>
Cc: Elias Oltmanns <eo@...>, <linux-ide@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>, <lmb@...>
Date: Thursday, February 28, 2008 - 1:00 pm

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

I don't know the details, but I believe the Linux-HA heartbeat daemons
take significant effort to eliminate unexpected delays.  See
http://www.linux-ha.org/

Lars Marowsky-Bree of Novell is extremely involved in the project and
he at least occasionally posts on LKML.  I've cc'ed him.

Greg
-- 
Greg Freemyer
Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer
First 99 Days Litigation White Paper -
http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf

The Norcross Group
The Intersection of Evidence & Technology
http://www.norcrossgroup.com
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC] Disk shock protection (revisited), Elias Oltmanns, (Thu Feb 28, 4:24 am)
Re: [RFC] Disk shock protection (revisited), Alan Cox, (Thu Feb 28, 7:13 am)
Re: [RFC] Disk shock protection (revisited), Pavel Machek, (Sun Feb 24, 2:03 pm)
Re: [RFC] Disk shock protection (revisited), Greg Freemyer, (Thu Feb 28, 1:00 pm)
speck-geostationary