On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 16:44 +0100, Michael Kerrisk wrote:Yes, and yes, others would be blocking on futexes and the like. Per process. Requests have been made to allow for per thread, but rlimits are not. Its really not meant as a fine-grained deadline notification mechanism, we have posix timers for that, but as a watchdog to ensure we behave 'well'. --
| Arnd Bergmann | SCHED_IDLE documentation |
| david | Re: limits on raid |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: multiple updates |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: Rescheduling interrupts |
git: | |
| Russ Brown | git-svn: Branching clarifications |
| Sam Song | Fwd: [OT] Re: Git via a proxy server? |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: More precise tag following |
| Pierre Habouzit | Re: People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Michael | Virtual interface |
| Stijn | Re: libiconv problem |
| Stefan Beke | mail dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files |
| Amaury De Ganseman | "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" when using bittorrent or another p2p |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Darren Senn | Re: Elm |
| Seung-Chul Woo | Is it possible to mount GNU HURD file system as DOS in SLS? |
| David Willmore | Re: Intel, the Pentium and Linux |
