Hi,
I got this with 2.6.25-rc3 when doing an rm -rf on a HFS+ filesystem:
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.25-rc3 #6
---------------------------------------------
rm/7564 is trying to acquire lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){--..}, at: [<ffffffff880fc4ba>] hfsplus_block_free+0x57/0x209 [hfsplus]
but task is already holding lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80284f1c>] vfs_unlink+0x41/0xb7
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by rm/7564:
#0: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#5/1){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80286cac>] do_unlinkat+0x6c/0x154
#1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80284f1c>] vfs_unlink+0x41/0xb7
stack backtrace:
Pid: 7564, comm: rm Not tainted 2.6.25-rc3 #6
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff802497bb>] __lock_acquire+0x849/0xbd5
[<ffffffff880fc4ba>] :hfsplus:hfsplus_block_free+0x57/0x209
[<ffffffff80249efd>] lock_acquire+0x51/0x6c
[<ffffffff880fc4ba>] :hfsplus:hfsplus_block_free+0x57/0x209
[<ffffffff80246b71>] debug_mutex_lock_common+0x16/0x23
[<ffffffff80418eb0>] mutex_lock_nested+0xd9/0x268
[<ffffffff880fc4ba>] :hfsplus:hfsplus_block_free+0x57/0x209
[<ffffffff880f647f>] :hfsplus:hfsplus_free_extents+0x54/0x9b
[<ffffffff880f6a92>] :hfsplus:hfsplus_file_truncate+0xa4/0x2ce
[<ffffffff880f52de>] :hfsplus:hfsplus_delete_inode+0x57/0x5d
[<ffffffff880f77e6>] :hfsplus:hfsplus_unlink+0xd0/0x158
[<ffffffff80284f36>] vfs_unlink+0x5b/0xb7
[<ffffffff80286cf1>] do_unlinkat+0xb1/0x154
[<ffffffff80419e4c>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x35/0x3a
[<ffffffff80248b03>] trace_hardirqs_on+0xf3/0x117
[<ffffffff80419e4c>] trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x35/0x3a
[<ffffffff880fb4a5>] :hfsplus:hfsplus_uni2asc+0x251/0x29f
[<ffffffff8020b0bb>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x7b/0x80
Is this merely a case for annotation?
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --=- ===--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
| Arnd Bergmann | SCHED_IDLE documentation |
| david | Re: limits on raid |
| Jan Engelhardt | Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: multiple updates |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: Rescheduling interrupts |
git: | |
| Russ Brown | git-svn: Branching clarifications |
| Sam Song | Fwd: [OT] Re: Git via a proxy server? |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: More precise tag following |
| Pierre Habouzit | Re: People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Michael | Virtual interface |
| Stijn | Re: libiconv problem |
| Stefan Beke | mail dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files |
| Amaury De Ganseman | "ping: sendto: No buffer space available" when using bittorrent or another p2p |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Darren Senn | Re: Elm |
| Seung-Chul Woo | Is it possible to mount GNU HURD file system as DOS in SLS? |
| David Willmore | Re: Intel, the Pentium and Linux |
