login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
February
»
28
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Mike Galbraith <efault@...>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-ide@...>, <linux-scsi@...>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...>
Subject:
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
Date: Thursday, February 28, 2008 - 4:20 am
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 16:43 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
quoted text
> Hello, all. > > Sorry about the delay. Was buried under other stuff. Mike, thanks a > lot for reporting and analyzing the problem; however, the patch is > slightly incorrect. rq->data_len is rq->data_len + extra stuff for > alignment and padding, so the correct thing to do is... > > req->raw_data_len -= req->data_len - scsi_get_resid(cmd); > req->data_len = scsi_get_resid(cmd);
Ah, close but no banana. (feeds poor wingless patchlet to bit-wolf)
quoted text
> which is ugly and error-prone. In addition, this isn't the only place > where resid is set. Other block drivers do this too. This definitely > should be done in block layer. > > With rq->data_len and rq->raw_data_len, it's impossible to translate > resid of rq->data_len to resid of rq->raw_data_len as block layer > doesn't know how much was extra data after rq->data_len is modified. > The attached patch substitutes rq->raw_data_len w/ rq->extra_len and > adds blk_rq_raw_data_len(). Things look cleaner this way and the resid > problem should be solved with this. > > Can you please verify the attached patch fixes the problem? > > Thanks.
Thank you, works fine.
quoted text
> plain text document attachment (patch) > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > index 775c851..929ab61 100644 > --- a/block/blk-core.c > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq) > rq->nr_hw_segments = 0; > rq->ioprio = 0; > rq->special = NULL; > - rq->raw_data_len = 0; > + rq->extra_len = 0; > rq->buffer = NULL; > rq->tag = -1; > rq->errors = 0; > @@ -2016,7 +2016,6 @@ void blk_rq_bio_prep(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, > rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors; > rq->hard_nr_sectors = rq->nr_sectors = bio_sectors(bio); > rq->buffer = bio_data(bio); > - rq->raw_data_len = bio->bi_size; > rq->data_len = bio->bi_size; > > rq->bio = rq->biotail = bio; > diff --git a/block/blk-map.c b/block/blk-map.c > index 09f7fd0..c67a75f 100644 > --- a/block/blk-map.c > +++ b/block/blk-map.c > @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ int blk_rq_append_bio(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, > rq->biotail->bi_next = bio; > rq->biotail = bio; > > - rq->raw_data_len += bio->bi_size; > rq->data_len += bio->bi_size; > } > return 0; > @@ -156,6 +155,7 @@ int blk_rq_map_user(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq, > bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1].bv_len += pad_len; > bio->bi_size += pad_len; > rq->data_len += pad_len; > + rq->extra_len += pad_len; > } > > rq->buffer = rq->data = NULL; > diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c > index 7506c4f..efb5b4d 100644 > --- a/block/blk-merge.c > +++ b/block/blk-merge.c > @@ -232,6 +232,7 @@ new_segment: > (PAGE_SIZE - 1)); > nsegs++; > rq->data_len += q->dma_drain_size; > + rq->extra_len += q->dma_drain_size; > } > > if (sg) > diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c > index 7f3c095..81b2133 100644 > --- a/block/bsg.c > +++ b/block/bsg.c > @@ -437,14 +437,14 @@ static int blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, > } > > if (rq->next_rq) { > - hdr->dout_resid = rq->raw_data_len; > - hdr->din_resid = rq->next_rq->raw_data_len; > + hdr->dout_resid = blk_rq_raw_data_len(rq); > + hdr->din_resid = blk_rq_raw_data_len(rq->next_rq); > blk_rq_unmap_user(bidi_bio); > blk_put_request(rq->next_rq); > } else if (rq_data_dir(rq) == READ) > - hdr->din_resid = rq->raw_data_len; > + hdr->din_resid = blk_rq_raw_data_len(rq); > else > - hdr->dout_resid = rq->raw_data_len; > + hdr->dout_resid = blk_rq_raw_data_len(rq); > > /* > * If the request generated a negative error number, return it > diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c > index e993cac..32424b3 100644 > --- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c > +++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c > @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static int blk_complete_sghdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_hdr *hdr, > hdr->info = 0; > if (hdr->masked_status || hdr->host_status || hdr->driver_status) > hdr->info |= SG_INFO_CHECK; > - hdr->resid = rq->raw_data_len; > + hdr->resid = blk_rq_raw_data_len(rq); > hdr->sb_len_wr = 0; > > if (rq->sense_len && hdr->sbp) { > @@ -528,8 +528,8 @@ static int __blk_send_generic(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk, > rq = blk_get_request(q, WRITE, __GFP_WAIT); > rq->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC; > rq->data = NULL; > - rq->raw_data_len = 0; > rq->data_len = 0; > + rq->extra_len = 0; > rq->timeout = BLK_DEFAULT_SG_TIMEOUT; > memset(rq->cmd, 0, sizeof(rq->cmd)); > rq->cmd[0] = cmd; > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c > index 0562b0a..5cab84c 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c > @@ -2539,7 +2539,8 @@ static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) > * want to set it properly, and for DMA where it is > * effectively meaningless. > */ > - nbytes = min(scmd->request->raw_data_len, (unsigned int)63 * 1024); > + nbytes = min(blk_rq_raw_data_len(scmd->request), > + (unsigned int)63 * 1024); > > /* Most ATAPI devices which honor transfer chunk size don't > * behave according to the spec when odd chunk size which > diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss.c b/drivers/block/cciss.c > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h > index 6fe67d1..57e2a9e 100644 > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h > @@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ struct request { > unsigned int cmd_len; > unsigned char cmd[BLK_MAX_CDB]; > > - unsigned int raw_data_len; > unsigned int data_len; > + unsigned int extra_len; > unsigned int sense_len; > void *data; > void *sense; > @@ -477,6 +477,11 @@ enum { > > #define rq_data_dir(rq) ((rq)->cmd_flags & 1) > > +static inline unsigned int blk_rq_raw_data_len(struct request *rq) > +{ > + return rq->data_len - min(rq->extra_len, rq->data_len); > +} > + > /* > * We regard a request as sync, if it's a READ or a SYNC write. > */
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Mike Galbraith
, (Thu Feb 21, 4:42 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Jens Axboe
, (Fri Feb 22, 3:32 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Mike Galbraith
, (Sat Feb 23, 3:42 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Mike Galbraith
, (Sun Feb 24, 3:54 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Feb 26, 5:48 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Feb 26, 9:36 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Andrew Morton
, (Tue Feb 26, 7:08 pm)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Feb 26, 8:46 pm)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Feb 26, 10:58 pm)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Feb 26, 10:24 pm)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Mike Galbraith
, (Wed Feb 27, 2:00 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Mike Galbraith
, (Wed Feb 27, 3:07 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Tejun Heo
, (Thu Feb 28, 3:43 am)
Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke
, Mike Galbraith
, (Thu Feb 28, 4:20 am)
[PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Thu Feb 28, 4:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Feb 28, 11:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Thu Feb 28, 11:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, James Bottomley
, (Fri Feb 29, 12:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Fri Feb 29, 4:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Sat Mar 1, 2:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Sun Mar 2, 10:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Sun Mar 2, 10:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Sun Mar 2, 11:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Mar 3, 12:09 am)
[PATCH 1/2] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Mar 3, 2:08 am)
[PATCH] block: separate out padding from alignment
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Mar 3, 2:10 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: separate out padding from alignment
, James Bottomley
, (Mon Mar 3, 2:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Mon Mar 3, 4:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Mar 3, 5:21 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Mon Mar 3, 8:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Mar 3, 9:38 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Mon Mar 3, 9:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Mar 3, 9:55 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Mon Mar 3, 10:01 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Mar 3, 10:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Mon Mar 3, 10:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Mar 3, 6:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Mon Mar 3, 10:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Mon Mar 3, 10:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Mar 4, 4:53 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 4:59 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 5:29 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Mar 4, 5:06 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Mar 4, 5:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 5:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 5:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 5:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 5:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Mar 4, 8:37 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 8:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Mar 4, 9:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 9:50 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 12:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 12:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Boaz Harrosh
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Mar 4, 3:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 7:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 7:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Tue Mar 4, 8:26 pm)
[PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completion by...
, Boaz Harrosh
, (Wed Mar 5, 6:16 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Thu Mar 6, 1:02 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Jens Axboe
, (Wed Mar 5, 8:33 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Boaz Harrosh
, (Wed Mar 5, 8:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Jens Axboe
, (Wed Mar 5, 8:48 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Tejun Heo
, (Wed Mar 5, 9:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Boaz Harrosh
, (Wed Mar 5, 10:46 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Tejun Heo
, (Wed Mar 5, 11:11 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Jens Axboe
, (Wed Mar 5, 9:51 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, James Bottomley
, (Wed Mar 5, 11:21 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Thu Mar 6, 12:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Jens Axboe
, (Thu Mar 6, 9:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Thu Mar 20, 8:54 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Tejun Heo
, (Thu Mar 6, 8:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Fri Mar 7, 11:07 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Tejun Heo
, (Fri Mar 7, 9:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Tejun Heo
, (Wed Mar 5, 10:08 am)
Re: [PATCH] blk: missing add of padded bytes to io completio...
, Mike Galbraith
, (Wed Mar 5, 8:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 8:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, FUJITA Tomonori
, (Thu Mar 6, 12:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Thu Mar 6, 1:02 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 3:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Mar 4, 3:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 3:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, James Bottomley
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Mar 4, 8:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 8:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, walt
, (Tue Mar 4, 1:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Tejun Heo
, (Tue Mar 4, 1:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Kiyoshi Ueda
, (Tue Mar 4, 3:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, James Bottomley
, (Tue Mar 4, 12:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Mar 4, 8:43 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Mar 4, 8:58 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 9:03 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Mar 4, 10:25 am)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 2:54 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Tue Mar 4, 3:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Jens Axboe
, (Tue Mar 4, 3:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Christie
, (Sun Mar 2, 2:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, Mike Galbraith
, (Sun Mar 2, 11:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling
, James Bottomley
, (Sat Mar 1, 11:19 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches
david
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Linus Torvalds
Linux 2.6.21-rc6
holzheu
Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
linux-netdev
:
Eric Dumazet
Re: Multicast packet loss
jamal
Re: iproute2 action/policer question
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jens Låås
Re: tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe)
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
492 guests
online.
Online users
hemisama87q
Syndicate