David Rientjes wrote:You mentioned CONFIG_NUM_RECLAIM_THREADS_PER_CPU and not CONFIG_NUM_RECLAIM_THREADS_PER_NODE. The advantage with syscalls is that even if we get the thing wrong, the system administrator has an alternative. Please look through the existing sysctl's and you'll see what I mean. What is wrong with providing the flexibility that comes with sysctl? We cannot possibly think of all situations and come up with the right answer for a heuristic. Why not come up with a default and let everyone use what works for them? -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL --
| Ryan Hope | reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1 |
| Michael Kerrisk | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Greg KH | [ANNOUNCE] linux-staging tree created |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: Rescheduling interrupts |
git: | |
| Sverre Rabbelier | Git vs Monotone |
| Kyle Moffett | Using GIT to store /etc (Or: How to make GIT store all file permission bits) |
| Steffen Prohaska | Re: [msysGit] Re: safecrlf not in 1.5.4 |
| Shawn O. Pearce | [PATCH] Correct dir.c to compile on Solaris 9 |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Jerome Santos | sshd.config and AllowUsers |
| Calomel | Re: Remove escape characters from file |
| Richard Daemon | OpenBSD 4.3 running in VirtualBox? Anyone have it working properly? |
| Sunando Sen | Re: [Q] "Cannot execute /bin/*sh: Permission denied" prevents login |
| C Wayne Huling | Re: Can males come from... |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Craig I. Hagan | Re: Segate ST02 problems |
