login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...>, Paul Jackson <pj@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 7:52 pm

Hmm, shouldn't patches be sent inline ?
Otherwise I need to cut&paste in order to reply.

Anyway. cpu_system_map looks fine. It's identical in functionality (minus the 
notifier) to the ~cpu_isolated_map. Different name works for me.

As I explained in the prev reply I suggest we use CPU hotplug instead of the 
brand new notifier mechanism that requires changes to a bunch of things, and 
at the end of the day ends up doing the same exact thing. ie Moving things out 
of the CPU that is being isolated.


I beleive those masks belong in kernel/cpu.c instead of kernel/sched.c.
It can be done with a separate patch of course.

Max





--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets, Peter Zijlstra, (Wed Feb 27, 6:21 pm)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Wed Feb 27, 7:52 pm)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets, Paul Jackson, (Wed Feb 27, 8:11 pm)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets, Steven Rostedt, (Wed Feb 27, 8:29 pm)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Wed Feb 27, 9:45 pm)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets, Steven Rostedt, (Wed Feb 27, 11:41 pm)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets, Max Krasnyansky, (Thu Feb 28, 12:58 am)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets, Paul Jackson, (Wed Feb 27, 7:39 pm)
Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Wed Feb 27, 9:53 pm)
speck-geostationary