Re: [PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto
Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 3:16 pm

Adrian Bunk wrote:

OK, you say "Don't mix two different semantics into one variable X86_HT", right?

Thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP, Hiroshi Shimamoto, (Wed Feb 27, 2:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Feb 27, 2:26 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP, H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Feb 27, 2:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Feb 27, 2:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Feb 27, 3:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP, Hiroshi Shimamoto, (Wed Feb 27, 3:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP, Hiroshi Shimamoto, (Wed Feb 27, 3:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: X86_HT always enable on X86_64 SMP, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Feb 27, 3:37 pm)