Hi Paul,

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:04:57AM -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
quoted text
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008 6:24:11 pm Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > Introduce inode_getsecid(inode, secid) and ipc_getsecid(ipcp, secid)
> > LSM hooks.
> >
> > This hooks will be used instead of similar exported SELinux
> > interfaces.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> >  include/linux/security.h |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  security/dummy.c         |   12 ++++++++++++
> >  security/security.c      |   12 ++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >
...
quoted text
> ...
> 
> > +static inline void security_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp,
> > u32 *secid)
> > +{ } 
> 
> Should these both do a  "*secid = 0;"?
> 

Yes, this will also lead to consistency in the interface espcially 
after changing task_getsecid to do the same (in patch #3).

quoted text
> > diff --git a/security/dummy.c b/security/dummy.c
> > index 6a0056b..c2f4c52 100644
> > --- a/security/dummy.c
> > +++ b/security/dummy.c
> > @@ -422,6 +422,11 @@ static int dummy_inode_listsecurity(struct inode
> > *inode, char *buffer, size_t bu return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void dummy_inode_getsecid(const struct inode *inode, u32
> > *secid)
> > +{ 
> > +	return;
> > +}
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static void dummy_ipc_getsecid(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp, u32
> > *secid)
> > +{ 
> > +	return;
> > +}
> 
> Same question.
> 

Both will be changed to *secid = 0 in the comming send. Thanks!

-- 

"Better to light a candle, than curse the darkness"

Ahmed S. Darwish
Homepage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/