On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:11:55 +0100
"Wappler Marcel" <Marcel.Wappler@bridgeco.net> wrote:

quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> >>  #include <linux/types.h>
> >> @@ -103,6 +107,7 @@
> >>  					   - '3' from resolv.h */
> >>  
> >>  #define NONE __constant_htonl(INADDR_NONE)
> >> +#define ZERO __constant_htonl(((unsigned long int) 0x00000000))
> >This should probably use INADDR_ANY.
> My first try went in this direction. But at a second look I thought
> that the names ANY (255.255.255.255) and NONE (0.0.0.0) are indirect
> leading to confusion. The interpretation of the zero addresses in
> the DHCPDISCOVER packet is in the kind of 'no address' and not of
> 'any addressee'. So the meaning and usage of INADDR_ANY and ZERO
> may be totally different in this file.
> In my opinion it is necessary to distinguish between INADDR_ANY
> and the ZERO address which ist requested to be in the DHCPDISCOVER
> packet.
> 

Just delete the lines and the address will be zero because of
earlier memset().
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/