Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 - 8:02 am

* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:


hm, indeed. Then how about the other way around: couldnt the normal 
all-cpus SMP function call be implemented transparently via using 
smp_call_single() calls? The vector duplication is really ugly and feels 
wrong.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Nick Piggin, (Wed Feb 27, 5:42 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Andi Kleen, (Wed Feb 27, 6:04 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Nick Piggin, (Wed Feb 27, 6:07 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Feb 27, 6:27 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Andi Kleen, (Wed Feb 27, 6:33 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Nick Piggin, (Wed Feb 27, 6:50 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Feb 27, 8:02 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Nick Piggin, (Wed Feb 27, 3:14 pm)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Feb 28, 1:45 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Andi Kleen, (Thu Feb 28, 5:55 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Avi Kivity, (Sun Mar 16, 7:33 am)