Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> writes:Oh, I'm sure nobody will reject patches because of this now. It would mean no patches are accepted. Hopefully an elisp expert will implement it. Vim people probably need something like that as well, and the list of editors is a bit longer... -- Krzysztof Halasa --
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
| Jesper Juhl | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Joe Perches | Re: [RFC] New kernel-message logging API |
| Ken Chen | [patch] remove artificial software max_loop limit |
git: | |
| walt | [VOTE] git versus mercurial |
| Linus Torvalds | People unaware of the importance of "git gc"? |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: git + ssh + key authentication feature-request |
| Martin Langhoff | Handling large files with GIT |
| Christian Weisgerber | Re: libiconv problem |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Daniel Ouellet | Show your appreciation and get your 4.2 DVD |
| new_guy | Code signing in OpenBSD |
| David C. Niemi | Re: rsh: "rcmd: socket: Permission denied" |
| Peter MacDonald | demand paging: proposal |
| Peter Grehan | TCP SYN_RECV state: stuck forever in accept() ? |
| Dennis Robinson | Source for uptime, df, ps ? |
