> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:35:31 +0100 (CET) Nikola Ciprich <extmaillist@linuxbox.cz> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>> thanks a lot for reply, I'm attaching requested information.
>> please let me know if You need more information/testing, whatever.
>> I'll be glad to help.
>> BR
>> nik
>>
>>>> Areca support doesn't seem to be very interested in the problem :-(
>>>
>>> (cc's added)
>>>
>>> Please get the machine into this state of memory exhaustion then take
>>> copies of the output of the following, and send them via reply-to-all to
>>> this email:
>>>
>>> - cat /proc/meminfo
>>>
>>> - cat /proc/slabinfo
>>>
>>> - dmesg -c > /dev/null ; echo m > /proc/sysrq-trigger ; dmesg -c
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>
> Alas, that all looks OK to me.
>
> You never get any out-of-memory messages, and no oom-killing messages?
>
> Possibly what is happening here is that in this low-memory condition, some
> of the driver's internal memory-allocation attempts are failing, and the
> driver isn't correctly handling this. This is a rare situation which may
> well not have been hit in anyone else's testing.
>
> I expect that the Areca engineers will be able to reproduce this with a
> suitably small "mem=" kernel boot option. If not, they could perhaps
> investigate the kernel's fault-injection framework, which permits
> simulation of page allocation failures.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
