David,
Perhaps I missed it, but could you elaborate on what sort of testing
these patches for MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES and MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES have
received?
The main reason I didn't push my version of these patches in December
was I figured it would take a week or three of obsessive-compulsive
testing to verify that we didn't break various corner cases of the
mbind/mempolicy system call interface.
In particular, do we know that Oracle works with this? At least in
years past, when Andi was the primary developer here, he had some
good and detailed awareness of what it took to keep Oracle happy
with this NUMA memory policy apparatus. I don't know if we still
have that awareness.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
| Sam Ravnborg | Are Section mismatches out of control? |
| Karl Meyer | PROBLEM: 2.6.23-rc "NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out" |
| Bart Van Assche | Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe? |
| Adrian Bunk | Re: [Bug #10493] mips BCM47XX compile error |
git: | |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [RFC/PATCH] git-branch: default to --track |
| Linus Torvalds | cleaner/better zlib sources? |
| Peter Stahlir | Git as a filesystem |
| Yossi Leybovich | corrupt object on git-gc |
| Manuel Wildauer | Re: Editing C with... |
| Mark Thomas | [i386/Thinkpad T41]USB mouse + Xorg obsd 4.1 |
| Stijn | Re: libiconv problem |
| Daniel Ouellet | Re: Router performance on OpenBSD and OpenBGPD |
| Felix Radensky | RE: e1000e "Detected Tx Unit Hang" |
| Johann Baudy | Packet mmap: TX RING and zero copy |
| David Miller | Re: 2.6.26/tg3 ping roundtrip times > 2000 ms on local network |
| Dushan Tcholich | Re: ksoftirqd high cpu load on kernels 2.6.24 to 2.6.27-rc1-mm1 |
